Alternative Search from the Windows Live Toolbar

You may have read that the Windows Live Toolbar shipped yesterday.  It’s got a lot of new features, and uses the new Windows Live Search (live.com).  If you are like me, you may not like the new search engine because it’s still pretty slow (it is still in beta).  Since I do a lot of searches this is a show-stopper for me.  In fact, you might be inclined to uninstall the toolbar.  But wait! …

Before you do, consider keeping the toolbar and just swapping out the search engine to a faster one.  You can either do it through the Toolbar’s Options|Web Search|Other Search Engine setting, or just click on this file and it will set the following registry setting:

[HKEY_CURRENT_USERSoftwareMicrosoftMSN AppsShared]
“OtherSearchUrl”=”http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=$w”

Alas, now you can have nice, speedy searches and have your toolbar too!

Critical Update! “Unacceptable symbols” in font!

Not sure why, but over the last few days, windows has been hounding me about the following:

“A critical update is available to remove unacceptable symbols from the Bookshelf Symbol 7 font that is included with Microsoft Office 2003. The Bookshelf Symbol 7 font is contained in the Bssym7.ttf file.”

Turns out I already have the new version, but Windows wanted to make sure, I guess.

This site describes the defect pretty well – apparently the critical update first went out in 2004. Can you believe that there were swastikas and jewish stars in the font. Heaven forbid!

It bugs me that this was marked as a critical update.

So, in a single move, Microsoft has not only annoyed every Windows customer with an unnecessary Windows Update, but also completely alienated the Nazi party. How will they write their memos now?

iTunes and MSN Music Incompatibility

I am probably late to the game on this one, and it really doesn’t surprise me, but it sure is annoying.

About a year ago, I bought and downloaded one song from MSN Music.

Today, I purchased my second song, this time from Apple’s iTunes.

Then, I wanted to burn both to a CD. Of course, iTunes refused to read the music signed by MSN Music. And, of course, Windows Media Player can’t grok the new “mp4” format that you download from iTunes. So, I can’t burn them together. Well – you probably can, but you probably have to go through 10 steps I don’t care to learn.

So, I didn’t use them both. I used iTunes today, but I could have easily picked either service.

After the fact, I did some reading on this, andthere seems to be agreement, that iPod is indeed at fault for being proprietary. Read here and here.

Can you guys go settle this out and use a common format? You don’t do yourselves, or anyone else, any favors by not agreeing on the formats for music. In my opinion, you BOTH SUCK for letting this happen. Nonetheless, next time I download music next year, I’m using MSN Music again. (I know, big spender. This will certainly change roadmaps ’round the globe)

Too Much Funding is not a Good Thing

I met with an investor the other day who was talking about successful businesses, and he claimed that almost all of today’s big businesses started out with extremely humble beginnings – raising less than $10M.  I wish I could quote where that research comes from, but I don’t know.  But let’s assert that it is true for a moment.

His second idea had to do with investment funds.  His claim was that you should never trust a fund manager that keeps significant portions of his fund in cash.  The reason is because when an investor has extra cash to use, he can make lightweight decisions to invest in something new.  If all cash is invested, then buying a new investment means selling another.  Having to make that tradeoff forces the fund manager to scrutinize his decisions – does he want investment A or investment B?  He has to decide.  If he has the cash already in hand, he doesn’t have to decide – he can do both.

In business, the same may be true.  When managers have too many resources, the decision to use those resources can be made easily.  You’ll always get better decisions when you have to give up something before acquiring something else.  Having extra money in the bank allows you to avoid this critical thought process.

If you’ve read this far, maybe this is making some sense.  And, maybe it means that good managers (be it fund managers, people managers, software managers, etc) are those which are able to always make good decisions even if resources are available.

So, here is the catcher – inherently, people aren’t naturally good at being decision makers when there is no tradeoff.  Without a tradeoff, we can make decisions based on emotional moods or whims.  After all, the resource is available and ready to use, so today, I’ll make the decision “because I feel like it”.  I guess this consistent with Warren Buffet’s description of “Mr Market”.

Could this account for why large companies often fail to successfully enter new businesses?  Spinning up a new division from a successful one will have lots of resources and cash from the onset.  Using those resources wisely is hard to do.  Unless the business is inherently difficult with high capital expenditures where it’s obvious how to spend the money, it can be easy to make poor decisions.

Well, don’t get too caught up in this, because if you take this literally, you’d believe that the incumbent companies would never be able to enter new businesses without acquiring.   Odd, though, there do seem to be a lot of acquisitions recently.

Moved to ServerBeach

 

$100 ServerBeach Coupon

For years I’ve hosted my own linux server to host belshe.com and my few other websites.  It’s a little celeron box with 256MB of RAM and about 40GB of disk.  I’ve got so much custom perl, C++, and other code on it that hosting it on some of the cheap shared servers just was too much work.  It takes a non-zero amount of system administration to maintain, and I’m no longer excited about doing it.  I’ve had the hard disk fail a few times (most likely due to poor ventilation and overheating under my desk), and it’s a pain in the neck to rebuild.

Finally, a colleague pointed out that getting a dedicated server hosted elsewhere is getting pretty damn cheap.  I had assumed it was pricey.  You can get dedicated servers for $99 or so at some placed, but I elected moved to ServerBeach for $119 per month.  The buys me a dedicated Athlon 2200 with 1GB RAM and 80GB of disk.  Unfortunately, it only includes 2TB (yes, Terabytes) of bandwidth per month, and belshe.com requires a tad bit more than that, so it’s $80 extra per month for the unlimited bandwidth.

I’m still in the honeymoon phase, I guess, but it’s been great so far.  A technician called me up and answered all my questions, then he gave some solid recommendations on configuration and setup, and the server was ready in less than 24hrs.  This means I didn’t have to upgrade my crusty old 2.4 linux kernel myself!  Finally, moving all my apps was surprisingly painless.  I couldn’t believe it was so quick, and everything seems back in order.  It was a zero-downtime move.

If you are a belshe.com fanatic, and you feel like switching to serverbeach yourself, use my referral code and you’ll save $100.  If you don’t use mine, be sure to use someone else’s, as they give you $100 and the referrer gets $250 🙂  Just type in this coupon code when you checkout: 3W2BWG7SS7, or click this link: ServerBeach Coupon

 

Stopped Reading Digg

I have been reading Digg daily for quite a while now. I love the site – its got a great set of features, and the content that they raise to your attention seems pretty interesting.

But, I had to stop reading it.

Why?

Well, unfortunately, Digg is still making me “two click” through everything. I read digg through an aggregator (Rojo), and I can see the teaser headline, but then have to click TWICE to get to the actual content (once to digg and once to the original article). This annoyance is slow and frustrating.

As it turns out, I’ve got enough other feeds with good content, that I can live without Digg. I’m sure I’ll check it now and then, but I’ve removed it from my subscriptions for now.

I know this is tricky for digg. Its not easy to solve without significantly changing the digg experience. But I’d like the links in their feeds to take me to the origin article – not the digg repost, and thus avoid the double click.

Maybe someone else has a smarter idea?